4.6 Article

Bayesian Item Response Modeling in R with brms and Stan

期刊

JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE
卷 100, 期 5, 页码 1-54

出版社

JOURNAL STATISTICAL SOFTWARE
DOI: 10.18637/jss.v100.i05

关键词

item response theory; Bayesian statistics; R; Stan; brms

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Item response theory (IRT) is often implemented in the human sciences using R packages like brms and the probabilistic programming language Stan. These tools allow for the specification and fitting of Bayesian IRT models with various response distributions and parameter configurations, making it easy to extract posterior distributions and evaluate model fit.
Item response theory (IRT) is widely applied in the human sciences to model persons' responses on a set of items measuring one or more latent constructs. While several R packages have been developed that implement IRT models, they tend to be restricted to respective pre-specified classes of models. Further, most implementations are frequentist while the availability of Bayesian methods remains comparably limited. I demonstrate how to use the R package brms together with the probabilistic programming language Stan to specify and fit a wide range of Bayesian IRT models using flexible and intuitive multilevel formula syntax. Further, item and person parameters can be related in both a linear or non-linear manner. Various distributions for categorical, ordinal, and continuous responses are supported. Users may even define their own custom response distribution for use in the presented framework. Common IRT model classes that can be specified natively in the presented framework include 1PL and 2PL logistic models optionally also containing guessing parameters, graded response and partial credit ordinal models, as well as drift diffusion models of response times coupled with binary decisions. Posterior distributions of item and person parameters can be conveniently extracted and post processed. Model fit can be evaluated and compared using Bayes factors and efficient cross-validation procedures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据