4.6 Article

Therapeutic effect of neohesperidin on TNF-α-stimulated human rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF NATURAL MEDICINES
卷 19, 期 10, 页码 741-749

出版社

CHINESE JOURNAL NATURAL MEDICINES
DOI: 10.1016/S1875-5364(21)60107-3

关键词

Neohesperidin; Rheumatoid-arthritis; Fibroblast-like synoviocytes; Inflammatory; Oxidative stress; MAPK

资金

  1. National Natur-al Science Foundation of China [81672161]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neohesperidin (Neo) has shown potential as a therapeutic drug for rheumatoid arthritis by inhibiting abnormal activation of RA fibroblast-like synoviocytes, reducing inflammation and oxidative stress, inducing apoptosis, and blocking migration of the cells. The compound may offer promise in managing RA progression.
During the pathogensis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), activated RA fibroblast-like synoviocytes (RA-FLSs) combines similar proliferative features as tumor and inflammatory features as osteoarthritis, which eventually leads to joint erosion. Therefore, it is imperative to research and develop new compounds, which can effectively inhibit abnormal activation of RA-FLSs and retard RA progression. Neohesperidin (Neo) is a major active component of flavonoid compounds with anti-inflammation and anti-oxidant properties. In this study, the anti-inflammation, anti-migration, anti-invasion, anti-oxidant and apoptosis-induced effects of Neo on RAFLSs were explored to investigate the underlying mechanism. The results suggested that Neo decreased the levels of interleukin IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-alpha, MMP-3, MMP-9 and MMP-13 in FLSs. Moreover, Neo blocked the activation of the MAPK signaling pathway. Furthermore, treatment with Neo induced the apoptosis of FLSs, and inhibited the migration of FLSs. It was also found that Neo reduced the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) induced by TNF-alpha. Taken together, our results highlighted that Neo may act as a potential and promising therapeutic drug for the management of RA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据