4.2 Article

Lengthening and deformity correction in vascularized fibular autograft for a patient with Ewing sarcoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/23094990211044549

关键词

deformity correction; distraction osteogenesis; lengthening; vascularized fibular autograft

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A pediatric patient with Ewing's sarcoma of the tibia was successfully treated with vascularized fibular autograft to correct limb deformity and leg length discrepancy. Despite good progress in bone union, further osteosynthesis with iliac bone allograft was needed to address nonunion.
We report the case of a pediatric patient with Ewing's sarcoma of the tibia treated with vascularized fibular autograft where the resulting limb deformity and leg length discrepancy (LLD) were corrected using Ilizarov external fixator. A 14-year-old girl presented to our outpatient clinic with a deformity of the right proximal and distal tibia and an 11.7 cm of LLD after tumor reconstruction surgery. Deformity correction and limb lengthening were simultaneously performed using double corticotomy on the right proximal and distal tibia. One year postoperatively, the union of the right proximal tibia had progressed, but nonunion was observed at the right distal corticotomy site. To address this, osteosynthesis with tricortical iliac bone allograft was performed after the removal of the Ilizarov external fixator. After 6 months, the union of the distal tibia was confirmed, and the varus deformity of proximal and distal tibia improved. The LLD was also decreased, but the left lower limb was still longer by 3 cm. This report shows that vascularized fibular autografts can potentially be used for the gradual correction of LLD and deformities. However, for the treatment of multiple deformities in bones previously reconstructed with vascularized fibular graft, the possibility of impaired bone forming potential of the fibular graft should be considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据