4.3 Article

State-of-charge estimation for second-life lithium-ion batteries based on cell difference model and adaptive fading unscented Kalman filter algorithm

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ijlct/ctab019

关键词

electric vehicles; echelon utilization; lithium-ion batteries; state-of-charge

资金

  1. Hubei Province Technological Innovation Project (Major Special Project) [2018AAA056]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An adaptive fading unscented Kalman filtering algorithm based on the cell difference model is proposed to improve the accuracy of state-of-charge estimation for retired lithium-ion battery packs. Characteristic data obtained from discharge tests on screened batteries and simulated experimental data validate the effectiveness of this method in improving SOC estimation accuracy.
Lithium-ion batteries retired from electric vehicles can provide considerable economic benefits when they are retired for secondary use. However, retired batteries after screening and restructuring still face the problem of inaccurate battery pack state-of-charge (SOC) estimation due to the existence of extreme inconsistency. To solve this problem, an adaptive fading unscented Kalman filtering (AFUKF) algorithm based on the cell difference model (CDM) is proposed in this paper for improving the accuracy of SOC estimation of retired lithium-ion battery packs. Firstly, an improved CDM based on a hypothetical Rint model is developed based on a second-order resistor/capacitor equivalent circuit model. Secondly, an AFUKF algorithm is developed to improve the adaptability and robustness of local state estimation against process modelling errors. Finally, characteristic data are obtained by conducting discharge tests on the screened retired lithium-ion batteries under specific operating conditions. The proposed method can improve the accuracy of SOC estimation of retired lithium-ion battery packs and provide a new idea for SOC estimation of retired lithium-ion battery packs, as shown by the simulated real experimental data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据