4.5 Article

Short- and long-term effects of surface fires on heat stress protein content in Scots pine needles

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE
卷 30, 期 12, 页码 978-989

出版社

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/WF20084

关键词

Scots pine; needles; experimental burning; wildfire; post-fire impacts; heat shock proteins; Hsp; fire severity

类别

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research, Government of Krasnoyarsk Krai
  2. Krasnoyarsk Regional Science Fund [18-44-243007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the content of Hsps in the needles of Scots pine changed in both short-term and long-term after the fire exposure, as well as in response to reheating. The content of Hsps decreased in fire-exposed needles three years later, but increased during the heat stress test, indicating a relatively long-term 'stress memory'.
Plants can minimise the damaging effects of high temperatures through numerous protective mechanisms; however, it is largely unknown how these mechanisms respond to extreme temperatures associated with wildfire. We investigated the effect of experimental burning (EB) on the accumulation of stress heat shock proteins (Hsps), which are one of the factors of thermotolerance in plants, in the needles of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Previous fire exposure led not only to short- and long-term changes in the content of stress proteins in needles but also to changes in the accumulation of these proteins in response to reheating. The content of Hsp 101, Hsp 70 and Hsp 17.6 in the needles increased on the second day after EB (short-term effect of fire). Three years after EB, the content of Hsps in the fire-exposed needles was lower compared with the control needles. When these needles were subjected to the heat stress test at 45 degrees C, the content of Hsps increased, whereas the content of Hsps in control needles decreased. Our results suggest that Scots pine needles retain a fairly long-term 'stress memory', expressed through proteomic defence mechanisms, to wildfire heat-induced damage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据