4.7 Article Data Paper

A detailed radiostratigraphic data set for the central East Antarctic Plateau spanning from the Holocene to the mid-Pleistocene

期刊

EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE DATA
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 4759-4777

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/essd-13-4759-2021

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [ANT-0733025, ARC-0941678, PLR-1443690]
  2. NASA [NNX08AN68G, NNX09AR52G, NNX11AD33G]
  3. Gale White UTIG Fellowship
  4. G. Unger Vetlesen Foundation
  5. NERC [NE/D003733/1]
  6. NASA [97564, 106520, NNX08AN68G, NNX11AD33G, 148741, NNX09AR52G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a comprehensive ice-penetrating radar data set covering the Dome C area of the East Antarctic plateau, including 26 internal reflecting horizons (IRHs) collected over 10 years. By correlating with the EPICA-DC ice core, 19 IRHs spanning four glacial cycles were dated, along with indirect dating of seven older IRHs using a 1D ice flow inverse model. Depth and age uncertainties for all IRHs were quantified and provided as part of the data set.
We present an ice-penetrating radar data set which consists of 26 internal reflecting horizons (IRHs) that cover the entire Dome C area of the East Antarctic plateau, the most extensive to date in the region. This data set uses radar surveys collected over the space of 10 years, starting with an airborne international collaboration in 2008 to explore the region, up to the detailed ground-based surveys in support of the Beyond EPICA - Oldest Ice (BE-OI) European Consortium. Through direct correlation with the EPICA-DC ice core, we date 19 IRHs that span the past four glacial cycles, from 10 ka, beginning of the Holocene, to over 350 ka, ranging from 10% to 83% of the ice thickness at the EPICA-DC ice core site. We indirectly date and provide stratigraphic information for seven older IRHs using a 1D ice flow inverse model, going back to an estimated 700 ka. Depth and age uncertainties are quantified for all IRHs and provided as part of the data set.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据