4.7 Article

Glycolysis related gene expression signature in predicting prognosis of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma

期刊

BIOENGINEERED
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 8738-8752

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2021.1980177

关键词

Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma; TCGA; GEO; prognosis; gene signature

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81972529]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [19411961300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research identified and validated two novel glycolytic gene signatures, DDIT4 and PLOD2, as potential independent risk factors for predicting overall survival in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). These findings may provide a therapeutic target and survival prediction marker for LSCC patients.
Researches have suggested that aerobic glycolysis can reflect the development and progression of most carcinomas. We aimed to investigate whether glycolysis-related genes (GRGs) are associated with overall survival in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). Here, we identified differentially expressed GRGs in TCGA dataset and microarray sample of GSE27020 from GEO database. A set of two glycolytic gene signatures, including DDIT4 and PLOD2 was screened through Cox and Lasso regression. The risk score was calculated using the gene expression of the two GRGs. The high-risk group presented a poor prognosis through Kaplan-Meier method. The ROC curve indicated good prediction performance in survival based on the validation of four cohorts. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses suggested that two-gene signature could be an independent risk factor in LSCC. A total of 17 LSCC patients were enrolled to clarify the genetic expression through using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A visualized nomogram was then constructed to predict 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival. Taken together, two novel glycolytic gene signatures were discovered and validated, providing a potential therapeutic and overall survival (OS)-prediction biomarker for LSCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据