4.2 Article

Development of a liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometric method for the simultaneous analysis of free fatty acids

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 170, 期 3, 页码 389-397

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jb/mvab054

关键词

ammonium hydroxide; free fatty acid; isocratic LC; LC-MS/MS; pseudo-MRM

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT)/Japanese Society for the Promotion of Sport [15H06600, 18K16246, 19K09227, 21K08565, 15H05904, 21H04798]
  2. AMED-CREST [JP21gm1210006]
  3. Takeda Science Foundation
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H06600, 18K16246, 19K09227, 21K08565, 21H04798] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a strategy for measuring FFAs in complex biological samples, using key methods such as isocratic LC separation, postcolumn base addition, and pseudo-multiple reaction monitoring. The method enables the measurement of various FFA species, including ultra-long-chain fatty acids.
Fatty acids (FAs) play important roles in several physiological and pathophysiological processes, functioning as both nonesterified free FAs (FFAs) and components of other lipid classes. Although many lipid classes are readily measured using liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS), the measurement of FFAs by this method is not straightforward because of inconsistent fragmentation behaviours. In this study, we describe a strategy to measure FFAs using conventional reverse-phase LC-ESI-MS/MS, without derivatization. The strategy combines three key methods: (i) an isocratic LC separation with a high organic solvent ratio, (ii) postcolumn base addition, and (iii) pseudo-multiple reaction monitoring. The method facilitates the measurement of ultra-long-chain FAs, the accumulation of which is a common biochemical abnormality in peroxisomal disorders. This study delivers a broad strategy that measures a wide spectrum of FFA species in complex biological samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据