4.7 Article

General relativistic effects in weak lensing angular power spectra

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 104, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.083548

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [SNF CRSII5_173716]
  2. European Research Council (ERC-2015-CoG) [680886]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advances in upcoming weak lensing surveys have posed new challenges for accurate modeling of lensing observables, especially at large angular scales accessible by Euclid. The impact of line-of-sight velocities on lensing magnification, known as the Doppler magnification, has been recognized in literature. General relativistic potential terms slightly enhance the signal in the weak lensing angular power spectra.
Advances in upcoming weak lensing surveys pose new challenges for an accurate modeling of the lensing observables. The wide sky coverage of Euclid makes angular scales down to lmin= 10 accessible. At such large angular scales, general relativistic effects manifest themselves, and the lensing magnification cannot be correctly described by the standard lensing convergence only. The impact of line-of-sight velocities on the magnification angular power spectrum, referred to as the Doppler magnification, is already well recognized in literature. In particular, it was suggested that the Doppler magnification could be extracted by measurements of both cosmic shear and magnification. In this work, we point out two previously neglected aspects with respect to this method. First, the impact of the Doppler magnification is reduced through nonvanishing cross terms with the standard lensing convergence. This is particularly relevant when the sources are averaged over a bin of width Delta z 0.1, such as in Euclid's tomographic weak lensing survey. Second, general relativistic potential terms slightly enhance the signal. We present numerical calculations of all relativistic effects in the weak lensing angular power spectra on large scales.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据