4.6 Review

Oxide-based resistive switching-based devices: fabrication, influence parameters and applications

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 9, 期 44, 页码 15755-15788

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1tc03420k

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia [R.G.P.1/82/42]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review provides a summary of contemporary understanding of nanoscale RRAM devices, discussing their classification based on current-voltage behavior and resistive switching features. It also explains the impact of resistive switching effects with experimental parameters and the ability of RRAM to be integrated into advanced semiconductor circuits with interface changes.
In advanced computing technologies, metal oxide-based resistive switching random access memory (RRAM) has been considered an excellent scientific research interest in the areas of information storage and memory computing. Herein, we described a summary of contemporary understanding of nanoscale RRAM devices, and classified them according to their current-voltage (I-V) behavior, and various resistive switching features and corresponding parameters are also discussed. The existence of resistive switching effects with other experimental influential parameters explains better RRAM operation. Therefore, this review covers the abilities of RRAM to be integrated into the most sophisticated complementary-metal-oxide-semiconductor integrated circuits under additional consideration with relevant selector parameters to execute the operation. Additionally, we explained the route of changing the interface barrier height regarding the interface-based systems, such as inserting the tunnel layer and using different electrodes. Our findings show that by changing the specific parameters, the switching mechanism can be switched from one mode to another, which helps scientists assess the actual effectiveness and impact of resistive switching research on technology development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据