4.6 Review

Shedding Light on Data Reconciliation Techniques Applied to Analytical Chemistry

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10408347.2021.1997572

关键词

Chemical metrology; data reconciliation; detection of gross errors; improvement of the accuracy; minimization of the measurement uncertainty

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brasil (CAPES) [001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Data reconciliation is an important technique in analytical chemistry, yet it is less known and utilized by analytical chemists compared to other areas. It can be satisfactorily performed in decision-making procedures focusing on chemical analysis, chemometrics, biochemistry analysis, forensics, and environmental sciences.
Historically, owing to the increase in processing capacity over the years, validation and adjustment of measurements have become imperative. In particular, concerning discussions related to data and results in analytical chemistry, there is always a need to improve their reliability. The data reconciliation technique has the objective of using measurement redundancies to obtain the best estimate of the true value and, consequently to minimize its uncertainty. Unfortunately, this powerful tool is less known and used by analytical chemists compared to other areas. This approach can be satisfactorily performed in decision-making procedures that focus on chemical analysis, chemometrics, biochemistry analysis, forensics, and environmental sciences, such as in a characterization study, regarding conformance or nonconformance with the specification, doubts related to the malfunctioning of meters and about the compatibility of test methods. This work discusses and sheds light on the importance of data reconciliation, including data reconciliation statistics and application of the technique, traditional data reconciliation in analytical chemistry, principal component analysis based on data reconciliation in analytical chemistry, and fuzzy data reconciliation in analytical chemistry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据