4.5 Article

Enhancing the labor division in the balancing of apparel assembly lines with parallel workstation through an improved ant colony algorithm

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/15589250211055784

关键词

Apparel assembly line; parallel workstation; labor division; ant colony optimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An improved ant colony optimization algorithm is proposed to improve the match degree of operators and tasks in garment assembly lines with parallel workstations. Experimental results show the algorithm reduces efficiency loss of labor divisions and enhances workflow efficiency. Strategies for creating parallel workstations in assembly line are provided based on the trade-off relation between labor division and line arrangement efficiency.
In order to overcome the inefficiency of labor division and management confusion in garment manufacturing assembly lines when introducing parallel workstations, an improved ant colony optimization (IACO) algorithm with multi-pheromones is proposed in this paper, which provides a new strategy to improve the match degree of operators and tasks in garment assembly line with parallel workstations. In proposed IACO, the first pheromone is set for ant to improve the efficiency of lines efficiency by balancing the workload allocation among workstations, and the second pheromone determines whether to create parallel workstations by valuing the complexity distribution of tasks. Existing real data of a garment manufacturing factory is used to verify the effective of IACO and the result shows that IACO contributes to a smooth work flow, and simultaneously reduce the efficiency loss of labor divisions (ELLD). Moreover, experiments are conduct to explore the trade-off relation between labor division and line arrangement efficiency when introducing parallel workstations. And based on the relation, strategies to create parallel workstations in the assembly line is provided for garment factories with different staff qualities for different apparel products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据