4.6 Article

Barium promoted Ni/Sm2O3 catalysts for enhanced CO2 methanation

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 11, 期 50, 页码 31807-31816

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ra04115k

关键词

-

资金

  1. UBD University Research Grant [UBD/RSCH/URC/RG(b)/2019/012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that the addition of barium to Ni/Sm2O3 catalyst significantly improved CO2 methanation reaction, including increasing CO2 conversion rate and enhancing the basicity of the catalyst. Barium also transformed the morphology of Sm2O3 into nanoparticles, creating interparticle porosity that improved heat transfer efficiency during long catalytic reactions.
Low temperature CO2 methanation is a favorable pathway to achieve high selectivity to methane while increasing the stability of the catalysts. A Ba promoted Ni/Sm2O3 catalyst was investigated for CO2 methanation at atmospheric pressure with the temperature ranging from 200-450 degrees C. 5Ni-5Ba/Sm2O3 showed significant enhancement of CO2 conversion particularly at temperatures <= 300 degrees C compared to Ni/Sm2O3. Incorporation of Ba into 5Ni/Sm2O3 improved the basicity of the catalysts and transformed the morphology of Sm2O3 from random structure into uniform groundnut shape nanoparticles. The uniformity of Sm2O3 created interparticle porosity that may be responsible for efficient heat transfer during a long catalytic reaction. Ba is also postulated to catalyze oxygen vacancy formation on Sm2O3 under a reducing environment presumably via isomorphic substitution. The disappearance of a high temperature (similar to 600 degrees C) reduction peak in H-2-TPR analysis revealed the reducibility of NiO following impregnation with Ba. However, further increasing the Ba loading to 15% formed BaNiO3-BaNiO2.36 phases which consequently reduced the activity of the Ni-Ba/Sm2O3 catalyst at low temperature. Ni was suggested to segregate from BaNiO3-BaNiO2.36 at high temperature thus exhibiting comparable activity with Ni/Sm2O3 at 450 degrees C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据