4.5 Review

The definition of sexual selection

期刊

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY
卷 32, 期 5, 页码 781-794

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arab055

关键词

natural selection; sexual selection

资金

  1. Vetenskapsradet [2020-04992]
  2. Swedish Research Council [2020-04992] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sexual selection is a key component in evolutionary biology, but there has been controversy surrounding its nature and extent since Darwin first introduced the concept. Recently, there has been a renewed debate over the fundamental question of what sexual selection truly is. The definition of sexual selection presented in this review focuses on fitness differences associated with competition for access to gametes, while also addressing the role of female reproductive competition and challenging the definition with various scenarios.
Sexual selection is a key component of evolutionary biology. However, from the very formulation of sexual selection by Darwin, the nature and extent of sexual selection have been controversial. Recently, such controversy has led back to the fundamental question of just what sexual selection is. This has included how we incorporate female-female reproductive competition into sexual or natural selection. In this review, we do four things. First, we examine what we want a definition to do. Second, we define sexual selection: sexual selection is any selection that arises from fitness differences associated with nonrandom success in the competition for access to gametes for fertilization. An important outcome of this is that as mates often also offer access to resources, when those resources are the targets of the competition, rather than their gametes, the process should be considered natural rather than sexual selection. We believe this definition encapsulates both much of Darwin's original thinking about sexual selection, and much of how contemporary biologists use the concept of sexual selection. Third, we address alternative definitions, focusing in some detail on the role of female reproductive competition. Fourth, we challenge our definition with a number of scenarios, for instance where natural and sexual selection may align (as in some forms of endurance rivalry), or where differential allocation means teasing apart how fecundity and access to gametes influence fitness. In conclusion, we emphasize that whilst the ecological realities of sexual selection are likely to be complex, the definition of sexual selection is rather simple.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据