期刊
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY
卷 32, 期 5, 页码 781-794出版社
OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arab055
关键词
natural selection; sexual selection
资金
- Vetenskapsradet [2020-04992]
- Swedish Research Council [2020-04992] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council
Sexual selection is a key component in evolutionary biology, but there has been controversy surrounding its nature and extent since Darwin first introduced the concept. Recently, there has been a renewed debate over the fundamental question of what sexual selection truly is. The definition of sexual selection presented in this review focuses on fitness differences associated with competition for access to gametes, while also addressing the role of female reproductive competition and challenging the definition with various scenarios.
Sexual selection is a key component of evolutionary biology. However, from the very formulation of sexual selection by Darwin, the nature and extent of sexual selection have been controversial. Recently, such controversy has led back to the fundamental question of just what sexual selection is. This has included how we incorporate female-female reproductive competition into sexual or natural selection. In this review, we do four things. First, we examine what we want a definition to do. Second, we define sexual selection: sexual selection is any selection that arises from fitness differences associated with nonrandom success in the competition for access to gametes for fertilization. An important outcome of this is that as mates often also offer access to resources, when those resources are the targets of the competition, rather than their gametes, the process should be considered natural rather than sexual selection. We believe this definition encapsulates both much of Darwin's original thinking about sexual selection, and much of how contemporary biologists use the concept of sexual selection. Third, we address alternative definitions, focusing in some detail on the role of female reproductive competition. Fourth, we challenge our definition with a number of scenarios, for instance where natural and sexual selection may align (as in some forms of endurance rivalry), or where differential allocation means teasing apart how fecundity and access to gametes influence fitness. In conclusion, we emphasize that whilst the ecological realities of sexual selection are likely to be complex, the definition of sexual selection is rather simple.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据