4.5 Article

Experimental test of microbiome protection across pathogen doses reveals importance of resident microbiome composition

期刊

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY
卷 97, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiab141

关键词

bird; conjunctivitis; Mycoplasma gallisepticum; house finch; ocular microbiome; host-microbe interactions

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [IOS-1755051, IOS-1755297]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the protective effects of commensal microbes in host tissues against invading pathogens may vary with the dose and environmental context.
The commensal microbes inhabiting a host tissue can interact with invading pathogens and host physiology in ways that alter pathogen growth and disease manifestation. Prior work in house finches (Haemorhous mexicanus) found that resident ocular microbiomes were protective against conjunctival infection and disease caused by a relatively high dose of Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Here, we used wild-caught house finches to experimentally examine whether protective effects of the resident ocular microbiome vary with the dose of invading pathogen. We hypothesized that commensal protection would be strongest at low M. gallisepticum inoculation doses because the resident microbiome would be less disrupted by invading pathogen. Our five M. gallisepticum dose treatments were fully factorial with an antibiotic treatment to perturb resident microbes just prior to M. gallisepticum inoculation. Unexpectedly, we found no indication of protective effects of the resident microbiome at any pathogen inoculation dose, which was inconsistent with the prior work. The ocular bacterial communities at the beginning of our experiment differed significantly from those previously reported in local wild-caught house finches, likely causing this discrepancy. These variable results underscore that microbiome-based protection in natural systems can be context dependent, and natural variation in community composition may alter the function of resident microbiomes in free-living animals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据