4.8 Article

Comprehensive assessment of CO2 methanation: which H2 production pathway is practicable for green methane production in terms of technical, economic, and environmental aspects?

期刊

GREEN CHEMISTRY
卷 23, 期 23, 页码 9502-9514

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1gc02755g

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea Government [NRF-2019M1A2A2065614]
  2. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP)
  3. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea [20203020040010]
  4. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20203020040010] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A comprehensive study on CO2 methanation through process simulation, economic analysis, and LCA was conducted to determine the most practical pathway for green methane production. Based on itemized cost estimation and environmental impact assessment, H-2 production using AWE and wind power (scenario 2) was identified as the best pathway, followed by scenario 5 using PWE and wind power.
In this work, a comprehensive study of CO2 methanation by coupling process simulation, economic analysis, and life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted to find out the most practicable pathway for green methane production in terms of technical, economic, and environmental aspects. For this work, different renewable energy resources, such as hydropower, wind power, and solar power, and water electrolysis, like alkaline water electrolysis (AWE) and proton-exchange membrane water electrolysis (PWE), leading to 6 scenarios for H-2 production were considered. From the economic analysis in terms of itemized cost estimation, the levelized cost of methane (LCOM) for scenarios 1 to 6 was obtained as 0.108, 0.118, 0.144, 0.121, 0.132, and 0.159 $ kWh(-1), respectively. In addition, from LCA, the respective quantified environmental impacts (i.e., CO2 emission) were obtained as 0.347, 0.813, 2.33, 0.537, 0.842, and 2.52 kg CO2-eq kg H-2(-1) for scenarios 1 to 6, respectively. And then, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was carried out to decide on the most appropriate renewable energy and water electrolysis based on different criteria of renewable energy capacity with Technology readiness level (TRL) of water electrolysis, LCOM, and CO2 emission for technical, economic, and environmental criteria, respectively. From this work, H-2 production from AWE with wind power (i.e., scenario 2) was selected to be the best pathway for green methane production owing to the narrow priority range of 0.130-0.191. Furthermore, scenario 5 (i.e., PWE with wind power) was determined to be the second pathway with the same reason.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据