4.3 Article

CHARACTERIZATION AND INVESTIGATION OF CHICKEN LITTER AS A SOURCE OF PHOSPHORUS FOR FERTILIZERS

期刊

出版社

GH ASACHI TECHNICAL UNIV IASI

关键词

nutrient resource; organic fertilizer; plant nutrition; poultry waste

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study characterized chicken litter produced in the Brazilian Midwest and conducted a greenhouse experiment to compare its agronomic efficiency with mineral fertilizer. The results showed that chicken litter was less efficient in terms of nutrition compared to mineral fertilizer, but the improvement in plant growth indicated its potential as a nutrient source when used properly.
Chicken production has been growing in Brazil due to population growth and consequently the waste generated in this process, namely chicken litter, has also increased. Currently, the main destination of chicken litter is its application to the soil in areas near to the chicken production units. The objective of this work was to characterize the chicken litter produced in the Brazilian Midwest using different techniques, in order to diversify the application of this residue and minimize the environmental impacts generated by chicken meat production. Chicken litter characterization was performed by analyses of particle size distribution, moisture content, pH, water activity, proximate composition, total nitrogen, protein and non-protein nitrogen, and pyrolysis and thermogravimetric analysis. In addition, a greenhouse experiment was carried out to evaluate the agronomic efficiency of chicken litter compared to mineral fertilizer. Mass balance of chicken litter pyrolysis showed that it kept 50% solid mass and the first most significant mass loss of chicken litter occurs between 250 and 350 degrees C from the thermogravimetric analysis. Chicken litter was less efficient than mineral fertilizer. However, the great improvement in shoot dry matter yield compared to control showed the potentiality of this residue as a nutrient source when properly used.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据