4.6 Article

Catabolism of strigolactones by a carboxylesterase

期刊

NATURE PLANTS
卷 7, 期 11, 页码 1495-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41477-021-01011-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB27030102]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31700253, 31830055]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Strigolactones (SLs) play a crucial role in controlling plant shoot branching. A carboxylesterase and its orthologues have been identified as efficient hydrolases of SLs, revealing a catabolic mechanism behind the homoeostasis of SLs in seed plants.
Strigolactones (SLs) are carotenoid-derived plant hormones that control shoot branching and communications between host plants and symbiotic fungi or root parasitic plants. Extensive studies have identified the key components participating in SL biosynthesis and signalling, whereas the catabolism or deactivation of endogenous SLs in planta remains largely unknown. Here, we report that the Arabidopsis carboxylesterase 15 (AtCXE15) and its orthologues function as efficient hydrolases of SLs. We show that overexpression of AtCXE15 promotes shoot branching by dampening SL-inhibited axillary bud outgrowth. We further demonstrate that AtCXE15 could bind and efficiently hydrolyse SLs both in vitro and in planta. We also provide evidence that AtCXE15 is capable of catalysing hydrolysis of diverse SL analogues and that such CXE15-dependent catabolism of SLs is evolutionarily conserved in seed plants. These results disclose a catalytic mechanism underlying homoeostatic regulation of SLs in plants, which also provides a rational approach to spatial-temporally manipulate the endogenous SLs and thus architecture of crops and ornamental plants. Strigolactones (SLs) play a vital role in controlling plant shoot branching. A carboxylesterase and its orthologues were identified to be efficient hydrolases of SLs, which discloses a catabolic mechanism behind homoeostasis of SLs in seed plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据