4.6 Article

A donor-DNA-free CRISPR/Cas-based approach to gene knock-up in rice

期刊

NATURE PLANTS
卷 7, 期 11, 页码 1445-1452

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41477-021-01019-4

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Structural variations (SVs) play a crucial role in important agronomic traits in crops, and using CRISPR/Cas9 designed large-scale genomic inversion or duplication can create new genes and traits in rice.
Structural variations (SVs), such as inversion and duplication, contribute to important agronomic traits in crops(1). Pan-genome studies revealed that SVs were a crucial and ubiquitous force driving genetic diversification(2-4). Although genome editing can effectively create SVs in plants and animals(5-8), the potential of designed SVs in breeding has been overlooked. Here, we show that new genes and traits can be created in rice by designed large-scale genomic inversion or duplication using CRISPR/Cas9. A 911 kb inversion on chromosome 1 resulted in a designed promoter swap between CP12 and PPO1, and a 338 kb duplication between HPPD and Ubiquitin2 on chromosome 2 created a novel gene cassette at the joint, promoter(Ubiquitin2)::HPPD. Since the original CP12 and Ubiquitin2 genes were highly expressed in leaves, the expression of PPO1 and HPPD in edited plants with homozygous SV alleles was increased by tens of folds and conferred sufficient herbicide resistance in field trials without adverse effects on other important agronomic traits. CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing for gene knock-ups has been generally considered very difficult without inserting donor DNA as regulatory elements. Our study challenges this notion by providing a donor-DNA-free strategy, thus greatly expanding the utility of CRISPR/Cas in plant and animal improvements. This study reports a donor DNA-free approach for gene knock-up based on CRISPR. It induced designed promoter swap or replacement for target genes by triggering genomic inversion or duplication so as to elevate gene expression and generate new traits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据