4.5 Article

Reduction of mussel metamorphosis by inactivation of the bacterial thioesterase gene via alteration of the fatty acid composition

期刊

BIOFOULING
卷 37, 期 8, 页码 911-921

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08927014.2021.1981882

关键词

Mussel; metamorphosis; bacteria; biofilm; thioesterase gene; fatty acid; c-di-GMP

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFC0312104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The inactivation of the tesA gene in Pseudoalteromonas marina increased the c-di-GMP content, reduced fatty acid content, weakened motility, and enhanced biofilm formation, resulting in a significant decrease in mussel larval metamorphosis rate. Addition of extracted fatty acids from P. marina to the Delta tesA biofilms promoted biofilm-inducing capacity, indicating a regulation of bacterial biofilm composition by tesA gene.
The molecular mechanism underlying modulation of metamorphosis of the bivalve Mytilus coruscus by bacteria remains unclear. Here, the functional role of the thioesterase gene tesA of the bacterium Pseudoalteromonas marina in larval metamorphosis was examined. The aim was to determine whether inactivation of the tesA gene altered the biofilm-inducing capacity, bacterial cell motility, biopolymers, or the intracellular c-di-GMP levels. Complete inactivation of tesA increased the c-di-GMP content in P. marina, accompanied by a reduced fatty acid content, weaker motility, upregulation of bacterial aggregation, and biofilm formation. The metamorphosis rate of mussel larvae on Delta tesA biofilms was reduced by similar to 80% compared with those settling on wild-type P. marina. Exogenous addition of a mixture of extracted fatty acids from P. marina into the Delta tesA biofilms promoted the biofilm-inducing capacity. This study suggests that the bacterial thioesterase gene tesA altered the fatty acid composition of Delta tesA P. marina biofilms (BF) through regulation of its c-di-GMP, subsequently impacting mussel metamorphosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据