Risk blindness in local perspectives about the Alberta oil sands hinders Canada's decarbonization

Local perspectives can conflict with national and international climate targets. This study explores three stakeholder (community, provincial, and federal) perspectives on the Alberta oil sands as risks for a sustainability transition in Canada. In an ex-post analysis, we compared outputs from stakeholder consultations and energy-economy models. Our research shows that different local stakeholders groups disregarded some policy risks for the Alberta oil sands and Canadian energy transition. These stakeholders expected the sector to grow, despite increasing environmental penalties and external market pressures. The study revealed that blind-spots on risks, or risk blindness, increased as stakeholders became less certain about policy climate goals. We argue that risk blindness could be amplified by dominant institutional narratives that contradict scientific research and international climate policy. Strategies that integrate local narratives, considered as marginalized, provide perspectives beyond emission reductions and are essential for meeting climate targets while supporting a just transition.

Automated summary

Local perspectives on the Alberta oil sands as risks for sustainability transition in Canada were analyzed in this study, revealing that different stakeholder groups exhibited blind-spots on policy risks and expected sector growth despite environmental penalties and market pressures. Risk blindness increased as stakeholders became less certain about policy climate goals, possibly amplified by dominant institutional narratives contradicting scientific research and international climate policy. Strategies integrating marginalized local narratives are crucial for meeting climate targets and supporting a just transition.