4.6 Review

Empowerment of athletes with cardiac disorders: a new paradigm

期刊

EUROPACE
卷 20, 期 8, 页码 1243-1251

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/europace/eux268

关键词

Shared decision-making; Informed decision; Paternalism; Sudden cardiac death; Cardiac disease; Sport; Arrhythmia

资金

  1. Advanced Rehabilitation Research Training program of the National Institute on Disability Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR), housed within the Agency for Community Living (ACL) at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) [90AR5018]
  2. University College of London Hospitals Biomedicine Research Centre
  3. University College of London Hospitals Biomedicine Research Centre - National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
  4. British Heart Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Athletes with cardiac disorders frequently pose an ethical and medical dilemma to physicians assessing their eligibility to participate in sport. In recent decades, patient empowerment has been gaining increasing recognition in clinical decision-making. Empowerment is a process through which people are involved over the decisions and actions that affect their own lives. In the context of a cardiac disorder, empowerment means giving an athlete the chance to participate in the decision about whether or not to remain active in competition. Three models of treatment decision-making are described in this article, with progressive levels of empowerment: the paternalistic model (the athlete has a passive role), the shared-decision making model (both athlete and physician participate in the decision), and the informed-decision making (the decision is made by the athlete while the role of the physician is solely to provide information). This article critically discusses the issues involved in disqualification of athletes with cardiovascular disorders and suggests possible ways of incorporating patient empowerment in potentially career-ending decisions. The authors propose a model of empowerment, which gives patients the opportunity to choose how much, and if, they would like to be involved in the decision-making process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据