4.1 Article

ENGAGING AFRICAN AMERICANS IN RESEARCH: THE RECRUITER'S PERSPECTIVE

期刊

ETHNICITY & DISEASE
卷 27, 期 4, 页码 453-462

出版社

INT SOC HYPERTENSION BLACKS-ISHIB
DOI: 10.18865/ed.27.4.453

关键词

Minorities; Participation Rates; Recruiters; Observational Epidemiologic Studies; Barriers; Motivating Factors; Clinic Education

资金

  1. Duke Cancer Institute
  2. National Cancer Institute [R01 CA142081]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To examine barriers recruiters encounter when enrolling African American study participants, identify motivating factors to increase research participation, and provide recommendations to facilitate successful minority recruitment. Background: Recruiters are often the first point of contact between the research study and potential African American participants. While challenges in enrolling African Americans into clinical and epidemiologic research has been reported in numerous studies the non-physician recruiter's role as a determinant of overall participation rates has received minimal attention. Methods: We conducted four 90-minute teleconference focus groups with 18 recruiters experienced in enrolling African Americans for clinical and epidemiologic studies at five academic/medical institutions. Participants represented diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds and were asked to reflect on barriers preventing African Americans from participating in research studies, factors that motivated participation, and recommendations to increase participation of African Americans in research. Multi-coder and thematic data analysis was implemented using the Braun and Clarke method. Results: Prominent concerns in recruitment of African Americans in research include fear and mistrust and inflexible research protocols. The participants suggest that improved recruitment could be achieved through cross-cultural and skillset building training opportunities for recruiters, greater community engagement among researchers, and better engagement with clinic staff and research teams.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据