4.3 Article

Price display technologies and price ceiling policies: governing prices in the WWII and postwar US economy (1940-1953)

期刊

SOCIO-ECONOMIC REVIEW
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 133-156

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ser/mwz045

关键词

governance; history; politics; regulation; technology; valuation

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council, project Digcon: Digitalizing consumer culture [2012-5736]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article examines the politics and technologies of price fixing and display in US grocery stores in the mid-20th century, highlighting the importance of price display. By analyzing trade journals, it demonstrates how government and retail professionals collaborated to influence price setting and display practices.
This article explores the politics and technologies of price fixing and price display in US grocery stores in the mid-20th century. Drawing on the literature on market devices and policy instruments, it complements previous studies focused on price setting processes by stressing the importance of price display. Through a systematic reading of the trade journal The Progressive Grocer, the article shows how displaying prices during World War II and the postwar inflation period combined the mastery of Government authorities at the federal level, and the expertise of retail professionals at the shelf level. It demonstrates that the regulation of prices is linked to mundane policies, technologies and practices, in particular the technique of 'stereoscopic prices' aimed at linking a reference price (the ceiling price set by the government) and the selling price (the actual price set by the retailer). Such technologies proved able to reinvent prices and price competition through their 'bifurcated agency', i.e. their propensity to both enact the scripts delegated to them (conveying price ceilings) and produce major side effects, like generalizing the practice of price display and linking prices to new values and qualitative dimensions of grocery products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据