4.6 Article

Preparation and properties of magnesium oxysulfate cement and its application as lost circulation materials

期刊

PETROLEUM SCIENCE
卷 18, 期 5, 页码 1492-1506

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.petsci.2021.08.002

关键词

Magnesium oxysulfate cement; Lost circulation material; Severe loss; Acid soluble plug; Formation damage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study developed a fast setting, high strength, and acid-soluble magnesium oxysulfate (MOS) cement to reduce drilling fluid losses, with significant plugging effect. Adjusting the composition ratio and adding retarders like boric acid and borax to MOS cement can effectively block different diameter and width loss zones, facilitating future oil and gas production.
Loss of drilling fluids in large porous and fractured zones inevitably up-regulates the overall cost of drilling. As a type of acid-soluble cement, magnesium oxysulfate (MOS) cement is arousing huge attention for the less hygroscopic nature and less damaging to steel casings compared with magnesium oxychloride (MOC) cement. The present study developed MOS cement as a fast setting, high strength and acid-soluble lost circulation material to reduce the problem of losses. As suggested in this study, a higher strength of MOS cement at 70 degrees C could be achieved by elevating MgO/MgSO4.7H(2)O molar ratio or down-regulating H2O/MgSO4.7H(2)O molar ratio. Boric acid and borax could act as effective retarders. Plugging slurry based on MOS cement could effectively block the simulated porous loss zones exhibiting a diameter from 1.24 mm to 1.55 mm, as well as the fractured loss zones with a width from 2 mm to 5 mm and bearing a pressure difference up to 8 MPa. Permeability recovery test demonstrated that it facilitated future oil and gas production. The successful field application in the Junggar Basin, Xinjiang, China verified the significant plugging effect of MOS cement for severe loss problems. (C) 2021 The Authors. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据