4.5 Article

Massive Upland to Wetland Conversion Compensated for Historical Marsh Loss in Chesapeake Bay, USA

期刊

ESTUARIES AND COASTS
卷 41, 期 4, 页码 940-951

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12237-017-0336-9

关键词

Marsh migration; Chesapeake Bay; Sea level rise; Marsh-forest boundary

资金

  1. Dominion Foundation
  2. NSF Coastal SEES [1426981]
  3. NSF LTER [1237733]
  4. NSF CAREER [1654374]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy Terrestrial Ecosystem Science Program
  6. USGS Climate and Land Use Dynamics Program
  7. Directorate For Geosciences
  8. Division Of Earth Sciences [1654374] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Division Of Environmental Biology
  10. Direct For Biological Sciences [1237733] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sea level rise leads to coastal transgression, and the survival of ecosystems depends on their ability to migrate inland faster than they erode and submerge. We compared marsh extent between nineteenth-century maps and modern aerial photographs across the Chesapeake Bay, the largest estuary in North America, and found that Chesapeake marshes have maintained their spatial extent despite relative sea level rise rates that are among the fastest in the world. In the mapped region (i.e., 25% of modern Chesapeake Bay marshland), 94 km(2) of marsh was lost primarily to shoreline erosion, whereas 101 km(2) of marsh was created by upland drowning. Simple projections over the entire Chesapeake region suggest that approximately 100,000 acres (400 km(2)) of uplands have converted to wetlands and that about a third of all present-day marsh was created by drowning of upland ecosystems since the late nineteenth century. Marsh migration rates were weakly correlated with topographic slope and the amount of development of adjacent uplands, suggesting that additional processes may also be important. Nevertheless, our results emphasize that the location of coastal ecosystems changes rapidly on century timescales and that sea level rise does not necessarily lead to overall habitat loss.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据