3.8 Article

Steller Sea Lion (Eumetopias jubatus) Response to Non-lethal Hazing at Bonneville Dam

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcosc.2021.760866

关键词

Columbia River; Eumetopias jubatus; habituation; hazing; human-wildlife conflict; non-lethal deterrence; Steller sea lion

资金

  1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Portland
  2. NOAA Office of Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research found that hazing Steller sea lions can temporarily reduce their numbers and make them more likely to move away from humans, decrease foraging behavior. However, over time, the sea lions' response to hazing measures will weaken, indicating that they will gradually become accustomed to these measures.
Protected Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) aggregate at Bonneville Dam on the Columbia River and prey upon multiple species of endangered salmon ascending the river. Hazing is a non-lethal activity designed to repel sea lions that includes aversive auditory and physical stimuli to deter animals from an area and has been employed with sea lion-fisheries interactions for more than 40 years but sea lion responses to hazing through time is not well-documented. We observed the behavior of Steller sea lions in periods with and without hazing during two spring Chinook salmon passage seasons to evaluate: (1) what effect hazing had on the number of animals present and their foraging behavior, and (2) whether they habituated to hazing. We found that hazing temporarily reduced the number of Steller sea lions, but only when actively hazed. During hazing, Steller sea lions were more likely to move away from hazers on the dam, decreased their foraging, and increased their time investigating the environment. However, these effects were temporary; their behavior returned to initial observation levels once hazing ceased. Furthermore, their responsiveness to hazing declined throughout the season, indicating habituation and raising concern for the application and long-term efficacy of hazing in managing predation on endangered salmon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据