4.8 Article

Desiccation and rehydration dynamics in the epiphytic resurrection fern Pleopeltis polypodioides

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 187, 期 3, 页码 1501-1518

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiab361

关键词

-

资金

  1. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. Yale University Institute for Biospheric Studies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The epiphytic resurrection-or desiccation-tolerant fern Pleopeltis polypodioides can survive extreme desiccation and recover physiological activity within hours of rehydration. The study found that xylem tracheids in the stipe embolized during dehydration but refilled after rehydration along with structural changes in the stele. Photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll fluorescence of the fern recovered quickly after rehydration, despite a broken hydraulic connection to the rhizome.
The epiphytic resurrection-or desiccation-tolerant (DT)-fern Pleopeltis polypodioides can survive extreme desiccation and recover physiological activity within hours of rehydration. Yet, how epiphytic DT ferns coordinate between deterioration and recovery of their hydraulic and photosynthetic systems remains poorly understood. We examined the functional status of the leaf vascular system, chlorophyll fluorescence, and photosynthetic rate during desiccation and rehydration of P. polypodioides. Xylem tracheids in the stipe embolized within 3-4h during dehydration. When the leaf and rhizome received water, tracheids refilled after similar to 24h, which occurred along with dramatic structural changes in the stele. Photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll fluorescence recovered to predesiccation values within 12h of rehydration, regardless of whether fronds were connected to their rhizome. Our data show that the epiphytic DT fern P. polypodioides can utilize foliar water uptake to rehydrate the leaf mesophyll and recover photosynthesis despite a broken hydraulic connection to the rhizome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据