4.0 Article

Revisiting the use of red and near-infrared reflectances in vegetation studies and numerical climate models

期刊

SCIENCE OF REMOTE SENSING
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.srs.2021.100025

关键词

Optical remote sensing form satellites; Surface reflectances; Vegetation monitoring; Chlorophyll; Leaf area index; FPAR; Climate models; Parameterization; Crop types

资金

  1. NASA [80NSSC18K0336, 80NSSC18M0039]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a new approach is proposed to estimate biophysical variables using a linear combination of red and near-infrared reflectances empirically determined from observations and simulations. The method shows promising results on maize and soybean crops, and the concept is validated with Landsat 8, Sentinel-2, and Planet/Dove data in Ukraine. The weights on red and NIR reflectances are found to be vegetation-specific and stable across different time periods.
Surface reflectance data acquired in red and near-infrared spectra by remote sensing sensors are traditionally applied to construct various vegetation indices (VIs), which are related to vegetation biophysical parameters. Most VIs use pre-defined weights (usually equal to 1) for the red and NIR reflectance values, therefore con-straining particular weights for red and NIR during the VI design phase, and potentially limiting capabilities of the VI to explain an independent variable. In this paper, we propose an approach to estimate biophysical vari-ables, such as Leaf Area Index (LAI), Canopy Chlorophyll Content (CCC) and Fraction of Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FPAR) absorbed by green vegetation, represented as linear combinations of the red and NIR reflectances with weights determined empirically from observations and radiative transfer model (PROSAIL) simulations. The proof of concept is first tested on available close-range observations over maize and soybean crops in Nebraska, USA. The empirical results compare well with those from PROSAIL model simulations. The proposed LAI model is then used with data from Landsat 8, Sentinel-2 and Planet/Dove, and the results are validated with in situ LAI measurements in Ukraine. We show that the weights on red and NIR reflectances are vegetation-specific and stable in time. The approach is further tested on crops and forests in the conterminous USA and on a global scale using MODIS LAI and FPAR products as proxies for ground observations. These LAI and FPAR, however, are not independently measured but derived from the corresponding remotely sensed re-flectances, which precludes recommending a final set of the weights/coefficients for the users, and, thus, should be considered mostly for demonstrating the concept. The results for crop types, other than maize and soybean, and for all forests are conceptual and need to be tested with real ground data. It was, however, encouraging to see that the derived maps of coefficients/weights exhibit regular patterns over the globe compatible with those of vegetation classes and crop types. Tedious and thorough work on compiling available in situ measurements on various crops and forests needs to be accomplished prior to large-scale applications, and the method needs to be further tested and proven that it works at a large scale. The proposed parameterization may be attractive for global studies of various sub-classes of vegetation, once the parameter coefficients are established, validated, tabulated and their stability verified. Ultimately, this approach may provide quantification of vegetation traits for the past decades and be a useful asset for climate models that include satellite-derived land cover classifications and vegetation variables for simulating surface fluxes. This is a conceptual paper, with a proof-of-concept supported by observations over two crops, for which we had close-range observations. It is not a technical note, which would provide users with a recommended set of coefficients for global applications. Our intent was to develop a paradigm, which could ultimately be useful in global models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据