4.6 Article

Oriented Crystallization of Hydroxyapatite in Self-Assembled Peptide Fibrils as a Bonelike Material

期刊

ACS BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 1808-1814

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c007131808

关键词

collagen-like peptide; hydroxyapatite; self-assembly; bonelike material; oriented crystallization

资金

  1. National Key R & D Program of China [2018YFC1105100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22077114, 21771160, 21625105]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2016QN810205]
  4. Scientific User Facilities Division [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  5. Department of Energy by Battelle [DE-AC05-76RL01830]
  6. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Office of Basic Energy Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The self-assembled fibrils of collagenlike peptide (POG10) and oriented mineralization of HAP crystals are used to produce bonelike composite materials, inspired by the molecular structure of collagen-I, which can eliminate the gap spaces in collagen-I fibrils.
Controlling oriented crystallization is key to producing bonelike composite materials with a well-organized structure. However, producing this type of composite material using synthetic biopolymers as scaffolds is challenging. Inspired by the molecular structure of collagen-I, a collagenlike peptide-(Pro-Hyp-Gly)10 (POG10)-was designed to produce self-assembled fibrils that resemble the structure of collagen-I fibrils. In addition, the oriented mineralization of HAP crystals is formed in the fibrils that reproduces a bonelike material similar to collagen-I fibril mineralization. Unlike collagen-I fibrils, POG10 fibrils do not contain gap spaces. The molecular simulation results indicate that in addition to space confinement, the molecular field generated by POG10 can also confine the orientation of HAP, enriching our understanding of physical confinement and shedding light on the design of synthetic biopolymer scaffolds for bonelike material fabrication.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据