3.8 Review

Transgene-free Genome Editing in Plants

期刊

FRONTIERS IN GENOME EDITING
卷 3, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fgeed.2021.805317

关键词

genome editing; CRISPR; Cas9; transgene-free; transgene integration; editor delivery

资金

  1. Taishan Scholar Foundation of Shandong Province [tsqn202103160]
  2. Shandong Science and Technology Innovation Funds
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong province [ZR2020MC026]
  4. Qingchuang Science and Technology Support Program of Shandong Provincial College [2020KJE002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genome editing is widely used in various plant species to study functional mutations for crop improvement, however, concerns about transgene integration in plant genomes have sparked legislative debates. Various strategies have been developed to prevent gene editor constructs from integrating, including genetic segregation, transient editor expression, and DNA-independent editor delivery methods. This review discusses the advantages and disadvantages of these different tools and aims to provide important information on alternative genome editing strategies for crop breeding.
Genome editing is widely used across plant species to generate and study the impact of functional mutations in crop improvement. However, transgene integration in plant genomes raises important legislative concerns regarding genetically modified organisms. Several strategies have been developed to remove or prevent the integration of gene editor constructs, which can be divided into three major categories: 1) elimination of transgenic sequences via genetic segregation; 2) transient editor expression from DNA vectors; and 3) DNA-independent editor delivery, including RNA or preassembled Cas9 protein-gRNA ribonucleoproteins (RNPs). Here, we summarize the main strategies employed to date and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using these different tools. We hope that our work can provide important information concerning the value of alternative genome editing strategies to advance crop breeding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据