4.3 Article

Northern Eurasian rhinocerotines (Mammalia, Perissodactyla) by the Pliocene-Pleistocene transition: phylogeny and historical biogeography

期刊

JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC PALAEONTOLOGY
卷 19, 期 15, 页码 1031-1057

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14772019.2021.1995907

关键词

morphology; morphometry; phylogeny; Pliorhinus gen; nov; Eurasia; Pliocene

资金

  1. Italian Embassy in Georgia
  2. Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of Italy (MAECI, DGSP-VI)
  3. University of Florence, Italy (Fondi di Ateneo)
  4. European Community Research Infrastructure Action, EU-SYNTHESYS project [AT-TAF-2550, DE-TAF3049, GB-TAF-2825, HU-TAF-3593, ES-TAF-2997, ILTAF-1324]
  5. SYNTHESYS Project - European Community Research Infrastructure Action under the FP7 `Capacities' Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revisited poorly documented Pliocene and earliest Pleistocene Northern Eurasian rhinocerotines from the late Pliocene locality of Kvabebi, Georgia. The specimens from Kvabebi show close affinities with the species Dicerorhinus miguelcrusafonti from Layna, suggesting the need for revised classification based on new data. Additionally, a cladistic analysis indicates the presence of at least two distinct rhinocerotine lineages in Northern Eurasia during the late Miocene interval.
Pliocene and earliest Pleistocene Northern Eurasian rhinocerotines are poorly documented and understudied in comparison to Pleistocene and Miocene ones. However, they represent a key-group of species for understanding the phylogeny and historical biogeography of their Pleistocene relatives. In the present paper, we revise the abundant material from the late Pliocene locality of Kvabebi, Georgia from a systematic, phylogenetic and palaeobiogeographical perspective. The specimens from Kvabebi are documented by two partially preserved skulls, one mandible and several postcranial remains. Morphological and morphometric comparison with the type material assigned to Pliocene and earliest Pleistocene Northern Eurasian Rhinocerotinae reveal that the specimens from Kvabebi have close affinities with the poorly known Dicerorhinus miguelcrusafonti Guerin & Santafe-Llopis, 1978, described from Layna (Spain). The latter species, represented by scanty remains from the Iberian Peninsula, is usually excluded from morphological and morphometrical comparisons and no findings were reported after the 1990s. Pliocene rhinocerotine species have monotonous dental and postcranial morphologies and only a few features allow us to discern the different species. The material from Layna and Kvabebi is somewhat smaller than that of other Pliocene taxa, except for the largest representatives of Stephanorhinus etruscus (Falconer, 1868). Accordingly, the earliest specimens assigned to S. etruscus on morphometric grounds should be revised in the light of the new data here presented. A cladistic analysis performed on 280 characters and 30 species suggests that the emblematic early Pliocene European species, 'Dihoplus' megarhinus (de Christol, 1834), is sister taxon to the Layna and Kvabebi rhinoceroses. Accordingly, both species are here assigned to a new genus named Pliorhinus gen. nov. Although distinct, this clade has close affinities with the paraphyletic genus Stephanorhinus, therefore suggesting the co-occurrence of at least two distinct rhinocerotine lineages raised in the late Miocene interval in Northern Eurasia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据