4.6 Article

An Improved GNSS and InSAR Fusion Method for Monitoring the 3D Deformation of a Mining Area

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 155839-155850

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3129521

关键词

Strain; Global navigation satellite system; Extraterrestrial measurements; Monitoring; Geologic measurements; Area measurement; Satellites; GNSS; InSAR; HVCE-BPNN method; three-dimensional deformation; mining subsidence

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC150540202]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41871174]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An improved fusion method was proposed in this study to monitor the three-dimensional deformation in a mined-out area, with results showing accurate measurement of mining subsidence patterns and providing more precise deformation measurement results.
Accurate measurement of the surface three-dimensional deformation fields in a mined-out area is essential for understanding the law of mining subsidence and guiding the safe production and construction of mining areas. In this study, we proposed an improved fusion method to monitor this three-dimensional deformation. We used the Helmert variance component estimation (HVCE) method and the back-propagation neural network (BPNN) to fuse the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) and interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) measurements. Based on this improved fusion method, we measured the three-dimensional deformation in the West Second Mining Area of Jinchuan, Jinchang City, Gansu Province, China, from March 22, 2019, to June 8, 2020. The root mean square errors (RMSEs) based on our method for the three directions of east-west (E-W), north-south (N-S), and up-down (U-D) were 21.4 mm, 7.6 mm, and 34.2 mm, respectively. These RMSE values are lower than those obtained from previous methods. The results show that the spatial distribution of the three-dimensional deformation follows the law of mining subsidence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据