4.7 Article

Methane gas emissions from savanna fires: what analysis of local burning regimes in a workingWest African landscape tell us

期刊

BIOGEOSCIENCES
卷 18, 期 23, 页码 6229-6244

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/bg-18-6229-2021

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1313820, G181115100]
  2. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
  3. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1313820] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Savanna fires play a significant role in greenhouse gas emissions, particularly in West Africa where accurate estimates are lacking. Research shows that head fires have much higher methane emission factors compared to backfires, contributing to significant differences in emission densities.
Savanna fires contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions. While it is recognized that these fires play a critical role in the global methane cycle, there are too few accurate estimates of emissions from West Africa, the continent's most active fire region. Most estimates of methane emissions contain high levels of uncertainty as they are based on generalizations of diverse landscapes that are burned by complex fire regimes. To improve estimates we used an approach grounded in the burning practices of people who set fires to working landscapes. We collected and analyzed smoke samples for 36 experimental fires using a canister method for the early dry season (EDS) and mid-dry season (MDS). We also collected data for savanna type, grass type, biomass composition and amount consumed, scorch height, speed of fire front, fire type, and ambient air conditions for two sites in Mali. We report values for fire intensity, combustion completeness, patchiness, modified combustion efficiency (MCE), emission factor (EF) and methane emission density. Our study found that mean methane EFs ranged from 3.83 g kg(-1) in the EDS to 3.18 g kg(-1) in the MDS, but the small sample did not provide enough power for this effect to be significant. We found head fires had nearly double the CH4 EF of backfires (5.12 g kg(-1) to 2.74), a significant difference. Byram's fire intensity was a significant driver of CH4 EF but with weak effect. Methane emission density increased marginally from 0.839 gm(-2) in the EDS to 0.875 gm(-2) in the MDS, a difference that was not significant. Head fires, however, had much higher emission densities than backfires - 1.203 vs. 0.708 gm(-2) - respectively, a significant difference. We suggest the reason for the higher methane emissions from head fires, which have higher intensity, is the longer flame lengths that burn green leaves on trees, releasing methane. We conclude that policies aimed at shifting the burning regime earlier to reduce methane emissions will not have the desired effects, especially if fire type is not considered. Future research should consider the state and amount of leafy biomass combusted in savanna fires.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据