4.5 Article

Synthesis of fibrous and non-fibrous mesoporous silica magnetic yolk-shell microspheres as recyclable supports for immobilization of Candida rugosa lipase

期刊

ENZYME AND MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY
卷 103, 期 -, 页码 42-52

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2017.04.008

关键词

Fibrous/nonfibrous; Mesoporous; Yolk Shell; Fe3O4; Immobilized lipase

资金

  1. State Key Program of National Natural Science of China [51433008]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province [2015JQ2055]
  3. Basic Research Fund of Northwestern Polytechnical University [3102014JCQ01094, 3102014ZD]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mesoporous yolk-shell nanoparticles (MYSNs), with a movable Fe3O4 core inside the hollow capsules, with two different morphologies (1) Fe3O4@SiO2@hollow@fibrous SiO2 (Yolk Shell-1) (2) Fe3O4@SiO2@hollow@ mesoporousSiO(2) (Yolk Shell-2) were fabricated as carriers for Candida rugosa lipase (CRL) immobilization, through a template-assistant selectively etching method. Firstly the hydrophilic Fe3O4 nanoparticles were synthesized according to the solvothermal method. Then, SiO2 shell was coated on the Fe3O4 nanoparticle surface by a sol-gel reaction. Subsequently, the resorcinol farmaldehyde (RF) shell was covered on the surface of as-prepared Fe3O4@SiO2 composites and sandwiched Fe3O4@SiO2@@RF composites were formed, which were finally provided with mesoporous fibrous (KCC) in the Yolk Shell-1 and mesoporouS Silica in the Yolk Shell2(Non fibrous). After selectively etching CTAB and the middle RF layer, the two kinds of yolk/shells composites were obtained. By utilization of their large and open mesopores (20-50 nm) with good surface area (457.78-625.54 m(2)/g,) CRL was immobilized after amino functionalization using glutaraldehyde as a linker. The ICRL on Y.S-1, Y.S-2 showed good loading (797-501 mg/g) and enzyme activity of (1503-837 U/g) respectively. Thermal stability, resistance to pH, recycling and storage capacity were improved as compare to free lipase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据