4.8 Article

SU(4) chiral spin liquid, exciton supersolid and electric detection in moire bilayers

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 127, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC

关键词

-

资金

  1. Harvard Quantum Initiative Seed Funding program
  2. Simons Investigator Fellowship
  3. Simons Collaboration on Ultra-Quantum Matter from the Simons Foundation [651440]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-FG02-06ER46305]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper proposes using moire bilayers as a platform to stabilize and detect exotic quantum phases. In the small distance limit, an SU(4) spin can be formed by combining layer pseudospin and real spin. By tuning a ring exchange term K, different phases including symmetric crystallized phase, chiral spin liquid, and exciton supersolid phases can be predicted. Evidences of these phases can be obtained by measuring pseudo-spin transport in the counter-flow channel.
We propose moire bilayer as a platform where exotic quantum phases can be stabilized and electrically detected. Moire bilayer consists of two separate moire superlattice layers coupled through the inter-layer Coulomb repulsion. In the small distance limit, an SU(4) spin can be formed by combining layer pseudospin and the real spin. As a concrete example, we study an SU(4) spin model on triangular lattice in the fundamental representation. By tuning a three-site ring exchange term K similar to t(3)/U-2, we find SU(4) symmetric crystallized phase and an SU(4)(1) chiral spin liquid (CSL) at the balanced filling. We also predict two different exciton supersolid phases with inter-layer coherence at imbalanced filling under displacement field. Especially, the system can simulate an SU(2) Bose-Einstein-condensation (BEC) by injecting inter-layer excitons into the magnetically ordered Mott insulator at the layer polarized limit. Smoking gun evidences of these phases can be obtained by measuring the pseudo-spin transport in the counter-flow channel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据