Polarized Raman spectroscopy in low-symmetry 2D materials: angle-resolved experiments and complex number tensor elements

In this perspective review, we discuss the power of polarized Raman spectroscopy to study optically anisotropic 2D materials, belonging to the orthorhombic, monoclinic and triclinic crystal families. We start by showing that the polarization dependence of the peak intensities is described by the Raman tensor that is unique for each phonon mode, and then we discuss how to determine the tensor elements from the angle-resolved polarized measurements by analyzing the intensities in both the parallel- and cross-polarized scattering configurations. We present specific examples of orthorhombic black phosphorus and monoclinic 1T '-MoTe2, where the Raman tensors have null elements and their principal axes coincide with the crystallographic ones, followed by a discussion on the results for triclinic ReS2 and ReSe2, where the axes of the Raman tensor do not coincide with the crystallographic axes and all elements are non-zero. We show that the Raman tensor elements are, in general, given by complex numbers and that phase differences between tensor elements are needed to describe the experimental results. We discuss the dependence of the Raman tensors on the excitation laser energy and thickness of the sample within the framework of the quantum model for the Raman intensities. We show that the wavevector dependence of the electron-phonon interaction is essential for explaining the distinct Raman tensor for each phonon mode. Finally, we close with our concluding remarks and perspectives to be explored using angle-resolved polarized Raman spectroscopy in optically anisotropic 2D materials.

Automated summary

This perspective review discusses the application of polarized Raman spectroscopy in studying optically anisotropic 2D materials, highlighting the unique Raman tensor for each phonon mode and analyzing the polarization dependence of peak intensities. Specific examples of orthorhombic and monoclinic materials are presented, demonstrating the differences in Raman tensor behavior. The discussion also covers the role of complex numbers in describing Raman tensor elements and the importance of understanding the electron-phonon interaction in explaining distinct Raman tensors for each phonon mode.