4.6 Article

Dexmedetomidine attenuates propofol-induce neuroapoptosis partly via the activation of the PI3k/Akt/GSK3β pathway in the hippocampus of neonatal rats

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
卷 52, 期 -, 页码 121-128

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2017.03.017

关键词

Propofol; Dexmedetomidine; Apoptosis; AKT; GSK3 beta

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81373498, 81060277]
  2. Science Study and Technology Development Program of Guangxi [1355005-4-2]
  3. Science and Technology Research Project of Guangxi University [2013ZD014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have demonstrated that propofol causes neurodegeneration in developing brains. Evidence has shown that dexmedetomidine has neuroprotective effects. However, whether dexmedetomidine can reduce propofol-induced neuroapoptosis and by what mechanisms it acts remain unclear. We investigated whether dexmedetomidine can attenuate propofol-induced neuroapoptosis by disturbing the PI3K/Akt/GSK3 beta pathway during brain development. Seven-day-old rats were randomly exposed to 100 mg/kg propofol and 100 mg/kg propofol plus different doses of dexmedetomidine or 100 mg/kg propofol and 75 g/kg dexmedetomidine plus PI3K inhibitor LY294002 or GSK3 beta inhibitor TDZD-8. TEM and TUNEL were used to detect neuronal structure changes and apoptosis. The expression of phospho-Akt, phospho-GSK3 beta, Akt and GSK3 beta were quantified using western blots and immunofluorescence. Pretreatment with different doses of dexmedetomidine protected against propofol-induced neuroapoptosis. Furthermore, propofol decreased the levels of phospho-Akt and phosphoGSK313, whereas dexmedetomidine partially reversed this inhibition. In addition, treatment with LY294002 inhibited the neuroprotection of dexmedetomidine, whereas TDZD-8 enhanced neuroprotection. Our results indicate that dexmedetomidine prevents propofol-induced neuroapoptosis by increasing the levels of phosphoAkt and phospho-GSK3 beta.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据