4.7 Article

Airlift photo-bioreactors for Chlorella vulgaris cultivation in closed-loop zero waste biorefineries

期刊

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
卷 144, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioc.2020.105926

关键词

Biorefinery; Biowaste to biofuel; Zero waste; Airlift photobioreactor; Chlorella vulgaris; Microalgae cultivation

资金

  1. University of Genoa, Italy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study establishes the operational conditions of airlift photo-bioreactors (AL-PBRs) for Chlorella vulgaris cultivation in a pilot-scale Biowaste-to-Biofuels production plant, aiming for efficient utilization of waste resources in the production process.
This study aims to set up the operating conditions of a battery of airlift photo-bioreactors (AL-PBRs) for Chlorella vulgaris cultivation integrated into a pilot-scale Biowaste-to-Biofuels (BtB) production plant, producing both biodiesel by transesterification of waste frying oils and syngas by wood chips gasification. Microalgae are fed with both wastewater rich in glycerol and flue gas. Mixing, mass transport, kinetics, and light conditions inside the AL-PBRs are chosen by keeping some dimensionless numbers (Re, Sh, DaII and A) fixed around the values found at lab-scale (11000, 1550, 23, 35, respectively). pH, T, nutrient-related ratios, and light intensity are adjusted inside the optimal ranges found at indoor conditions. The number of AL-PBRs, feeding/extraction time intervals, and flowrates are designed by mass balancing the entire pilot-plant in order to operate in continuous quasi-zero waste. Outdoor tests confirmed that 12-15 AL-PBRs with a total volume of 125-155 L reuse 28.8 L d(-1) of wastewater by-produced from the biodiesel units providing 228 L d(-1) of biodiesel and reuse the total of about 90 m3 h(-1) of flue gas in exit from the syngas combustion unit with power generation of 9-9.5 kW. The battery works at an initial concentration for each cycle of around 0.5 g L-1 and concentration at extraction of around 1.05 g L-1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据