4.8 Review

Current status and future challenges in implementing and upscaling vertical farming systems

期刊

NATURE FOOD
卷 2, 期 12, 页码 944-956

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s43016-021-00402-w

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vertical farming systems have the potential to produce food in a climate-resilient manner with reduced pesticides and fertilizers, and lower land and water use compared to conventional agriculture. However, successful integration of vertical farming into mainstream agriculture will require improvements in profitability, energy efficiency, public policy, and consumer acceptance.
Vertical farming can produce food in a climate-resilient manner, potentially emitting zero pesticides and fertilizers, and with lower land and water use than conventional agriculture. Vertical farming systems (VFS) can meet daily consumer demands for nutritious fresh products, forming a part of resilient food systems-particularly in and around densely populated areas. VFS currently produce a limited range of crops including fruits, vegetables and herbs, but successful implementation of vertical farming as part of mainstream agriculture will require improvements in profitability, energy efficiency, public policy and consumer acceptance. Here we discuss VFS as multi-layer indoor crop cultivation systems, exploring state-of-the-art vertical farming and future challenges in the fields of plant growth, product quality, automation, robotics, system control and environmental sustainability and how research and development, socio-economic and policy-related institutions must work together to ensure successful upscaling of VFS to future food systems. Vertical farming systems have the potential to form a part of resilient food systems through the production of reliable, high-quality crops in urban landscapes. This Review explores how multi-layer indoor crop cultivation systems currently operate and the conditions needed to upscale and support their integration into mainstream agriculture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据