4.6 Article

Heavy-fermion metallic state and Mott transition induced by Li-ion intercalation in LiV2O4 epitaxial films

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 104, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.245104

关键词

-

资金

  1. MEXT Elements Strategy Initiative to Form Core Research Center [JPMXP0112101001]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Foundation [19H02588, 19K03711, 20K15169, 21H02026]
  3. Chemistry Personnel Cultivation Program (Japan Chemical Industry Association)
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19K03711, 19H02588, 20K15169, 21H02026] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study on spinel-type LiV2O4 demonstrated the systematic variation of transport properties through structure modulation and electrochemical Li-ion intercalation. The heavy-fermion metallic behavior was observed to increase in resistivity with increasing electron filling in low doping regime, while a Mott transition was observed in high doping regime.
The spinel-type LiV2O4 exhibits heavy-fermion metallic behaviors at low temperatures, but the effect of composition modulation on them is unknown. We realized the epitaxial growth of highly crystalline LiV2O4 films and conducted the electrochemical Li-ion intercalation (electron doping) to investigate systematic variation of transport properties in Li1+xV2O4 . We found that adjustment of Li content during pulsed-laser deposition was important to obtain films exhibiting the heavy-fermion metallic behavior comparable to that of a bulk single crystal. At low doping regime (x <= 0.5), resistivity increased with increasing electron filling. The slope of their linear T-2 dependence also increased in accordance of a Fermi-liquid model. At high doping regime (x > 0.5), a Mott transition was observed over a range of Li content where a new spinel phase and the original one coexisted. The results revealed that the electron doping induced enhancement of the electron correlation and the resultant Mott transition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据