4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Adsorption of ammonium in aqueous solutions by pine sawdust and wheat straw biochars

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 25, 期 26, 页码 25638-25647

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-8551-2

关键词

Black carbon; Charcoal; Ammonium adsorption; Kinetics; Isotherm; Wastewater treatment

资金

  1. NSERC CREATE Grant
  2. NSERC Discovery grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ammonium (NH4+) is a common form of reactive nitrogen in wastewater, and its discharge to water bodies can lead to eutrophication. This study was conducted to understand NH4+ adsorption mechanisms of pine sawdust and wheat straw biochars in aqueous solutions and the factors affecting NH4+ removal. Biochars were produced by pyrolysing pine sawdust at 300 degrees C (PS300) and 550 degrees C (PS550) and wheat straw at 550 degrees C (WS550). Pseudo-second-order and Redlich-Peterson models best fitted the adsorption data. The PS300 showed the highest NH4+ adsorption capacity (5.38mgg(-1)), followed by PS550 (3.37mgg(-1)) and WS550 (2.08mgg(-1)). Higher H/C and O/C ratios of PS300 (0.78 and 0.32, respectively) indicated the greater presence of functional groups on the biochar's surface as compared to PS550 (0.35 and 0.10, respectively) and WS550 (0.36 and 0.08, respectively), resulting in different NH4+ adsorption through electrostatic interactions. The dominant mechanism for NH4+ adsorption by the biochars was likely chemical bonding and electrostatic interaction of NH4+ with the surface functional groups. Lower pyrolysis temperature resulted in a higher NH4+ adsorption capacity by the pine sawdust biochar. At the same pyrolysis temperature (550 degrees C), the biochar made with pine sawdust as the feedstock had a higher NH4+ adsorption capacity than biochar made from wheat straw. We conclude that biochars can be efficient absorbents for NH4+ removal from wastewater, and the removal efficiency can be optimised by selecting different feedstocks or the pyrolysis condition for biochar production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据