4.7 Article

Green-fabrication of gold nanomaterials using Staphylococcus warneri from Sundarbans estuary: an effective recyclable nanocatalyst for degrading nitro aromatic pollutants

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 2331-2349

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0617-7

关键词

Bacterial intracellular protein; Gold nanoparticles; Recyclable catalysis; Nitro aromatic pollutants; Wastewater treatment

资金

  1. World Bank ICZM project [54-ICZMP/3P]
  2. NCSCM (MoEF, Govt. of India) [21/RCO/CR/CMR/2013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microbial synthesis of gold nanoparticles (GNPs) has attracted considerable attention in recent times due to their exceptional capability for the bioremediation of industrial wastes and also for the treatment of wastewater. A bacterial strain Staphylococcus warneri, isolated from the estuarine mangroves of Sundarbans region produced highly stable GNPs by reducing hydrogen auric chloride (HAucl(4)) salt using intracellular protein extract. The nanoparticles were characterized utilizing ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometry, transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and surface enhanced Raman scattering. Highly dispersed, spherically shaped GNPs varied around 15-25 nm in size and were highly crystalline with face-centered cubic structures. Recyclable catalytic activity of as-synthesized GNPs was evidenced by complete degradation of nitro aromatic pollutants like 2-nitroaniline, 4-nitroaniline, 2-nitrophenol and 4-nitrophenol. Our GNPs show excellent and efficient catalytic activity with significantly high rate constant (10(-1) order) and high turnover frequency (10(3) order) in recyclable manner up to three times. To our knowledge, this is the first report of Staphylococcus warneri in the production of gold nanoparticles. This green technology for bioremediation of toxic nitro aromatic pollutants is safe and economically beneficial to challenge the development and sustainability issue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据