4.6 Article

Synergistic radiosensitizing effect of BR101801, a specific DNA-dependent protein kinase inhibitor, in various human solid cancer cells and xenografts

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH
卷 11, 期 11, 页码 5440-+

出版社

E-CENTURY PUBLISHING CORP

关键词

DNA-PK inhibitor; Ionizing radiation; radiosensitizer; DNA damage repair; solid cancer

类别

资金

  1. Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences (KIRAMS) [51322-2019, 51323-2019]
  2. Boryung Pharmaceutical [BR101801]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that BR101801, a DNA-PK inhibitor, can effectively enhance genomic instability induced by ionizing radiation and increase sensitivity in human solid cancer cells through multiple pathways. It affects factors in both the non-homologous end-joining repair pathway and homologous recombination.
DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), an essential component of the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair pathway, plays an important role in DNA damage repair (DDR). Therefore, DNA-PK inhibition is a promising approach for overcoming radiotherapy or chemotherapy resistance in cancers. In this study, we demonstrated that BR101801, a potent DNA-PK inhibitor, acted as an effective radiosensitizer in various human solid cancer cells and an in vivo xenograft model. Overall, BR101801 strongly elevated ionizing radiation (IR)-induced genomic instability via induction of cell cycle G2/M arrest, autophagic cell death, and impairment of DDR pathway in human solid cancer cells. Interestingly, BR101801 inhibited not only phosphorylation of DNA-PK catalytic subunit in NHEJ factors but also BRCA2 protein level in homologous recombination (HR) factors. In addition, combination BR101801 and IR suppressed tumor growth compared with IR alone by reducing phosphorylation of DNA-PK in human solid cancer xenografts. Our findings suggested that BR101801 is a selective DNA-PK inhibitor with a synergistic radiosensitizing effect in human solid cancers, providing evidence for clinical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据