3.8 Proceedings Paper

Dense Scale Network for Crowd Counting

出版社

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3460426.3463628

关键词

Crowd Counting; Dense Scale; Connections; Scale Consistency

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61771458]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a network model called DSNet for crowd counting, which uses dense dilated convolution blocks to preserve information from different scales and expands the scale range by dense residual connections. Through a novel loss function, DSNet achieves the best performance on five crowd counting datasets, demonstrating significant improvements in crowd counting accuracy.
Crowd counting has been widely studied by computer vision community in recent years. Due to the large scale variation, it remains to be a challenging task. Previous methods adopt either multi-column CNN or single-column CNN with multiple branches to deal with this problem. However, restricted by the number of columns or branches, these methods can only capture a few different scales and have limited capability. In this paper, we propose a simple but effective network called DSNet for crowd counting, which can be easily trained in an end-to-end fashion. The key component of our network is the dense dilated convolution block, in which each dilation layer is densely connected with the others to preserve information from continuously varied scales. The dilation rates in dilation layers are carefully selected to prevent the block from gridding artifacts. To further enlarge the range of scales covered by the network, we cascade three blocks and link them with dense residual connections. We also introduce a novel multi-scale density level consistency loss for performance improvement. To evaluate our method, we compare it with state-of-the-art algorithms on five crowd counting datasets (ShanghaiTech, UCF-QNRF, UCF_CC_50, UCSD and WorldExpo'10). Experimental results demonstrate that DSNet can achieve the best overall performance and make significant improvements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据