4.5 Review

Genitourinary Tissue Engineering: Reconstruction and Research Models

期刊

BIOENGINEERING-BASEL
卷 8, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering8070099

关键词

tissue engineering; urethra; vagina; urology; gynaecology; epithelium

资金

  1. Canadian Urological Association Scholarship
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Grant [258229]
  3. Fonds de Recherche du QuebecSante (FRQS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tissue engineering aims to produce 3D tissues by creating scaffolds and seeding cells to mimic interactions between tissues and cells. Urology and gynaecology fields face challenges of insufficient treatment options, requiring more representative research models based on human anatomy.
Tissue engineering is an emerging field of research that initially aimed to produce 3D tissues to bypass the lack of adequate tissues for the repair or replacement of deficient organs. The basis of tissue engineering protocols is to create scaffolds, which can have a synthetic or natural origin, seeded or not with cells. At the same time, more and more studies have indicated the low clinic translation rate of research realised using standard cell culture conditions, i.e., cells on plastic surfaces or using animal models that are too different from humans. New models are needed to mimic the 3D organisation of tissue and the cells themselves and the interaction between cells and the extracellular matrix. In this regard, urology and gynaecology fields are of particular interest. The urethra and vagina can be sites suffering from many pathologies without currently adequate treatment options. Due to the specific organisation of the human urethral/bladder and vaginal epithelium, current research models remain poorly representative. In this review, the anatomy, the current pathologies, and the treatments will be described before focusing on producing tissues and research models using tissue engineering. An emphasis is made on the self-assembly approach, which allows tissue production without the need for biomaterials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据