4.0 Article

Competitive ability of canola (Brassica napus var. oleifera) hybrids with black oat (Avena strigosa) in a subtropical environment

期刊

REVISTA DE LA FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS AGRARIAS
卷 53, 期 2, 页码 119-131

出版社

UNIV NACIONAL CUYO, FAC CIENCIAS AGRARIAS

关键词

Brassica napus var. oleifera; Avena strigosa; competitive interaction; replacement series method; aggressiveness

资金

  1. CNPq
  2. FAPERGS
  3. FINEp
  4. UFFS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the competitive ability of different canola hybrids against black oat, showing Hyola 571 performed the best in competition. Selecting a competitive hybrid like Hyola 571 helps maintain high yield levels in areas infested with black oat.
The objective of this study was to assess the competitive ability of canola (Brassica napus var. oleifera) hybrids in competition with black oat (Avena strigosa) in a subtropical environment. The experiments were conducted in a greenhouse where canola hybrids 'Hyola 61,' 'Hyola 76,' 'Hyola 433,' and 'Hyola 571' were tested individually for their competitive performance with black oat. The plant proportion between black oat and the canola hybrid was changed (100%:0%; 75%:25%; 50%:50%; 25%:75%; and 0%:100%) while keeping the total population of plants constant (20 plants plot-1). Photosynthesis rate (p.mol m(-2) s(-1)), internal CO2 concentration (p.mol mol(-1)), and transpiration rate (mol H2O m(-2) s(-1)) were assessed using an infrared gas analyzer 55 days after emergence. Leaf area (m(2) m(-2)) and dry matter (g m-2) were also assessed on the same day. The data set was analyzed by the replacement series method for competition studies. There was evidence of intense competition between canola and black oat, independent of plant proportion. The competitive ability of canola was distinct among hybrids; Hyola 571 performed better than the others in the competition against black oat. Choosing the most competitive hybrid, such as Hyola 571, helps maintain high canola grain yield levels in areas infested with black oat.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据