4.4 Article

Dynamic interaction induced explosive death

期刊

EPL
卷 133, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/133/40003

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India, New Delhi [EMR/2016/005561, INT/RUS/RSF/P-18]
  2. CSIR [09/093(0194)/2020-EMR-I]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research shows that the heterogeneity in the timings of interactions between oscillators in coupled dynamical systems significantly influences the dynamical processes, leading to an abrupt transition from oscillatory to death state due to occasional interactions, coexisting oscillatory and death states near the transition point.
Most previous studies on coupled dynamical systems assume that all interactions between oscillators take place uniformly in time, but, in reality, this does not necessarily reflect the usual scenario. The heterogeneity in the timings of such interactions strongly influences the dynamical processes. Here, we introduce a time-evolving state-space-dependent coupling among an ensemble of identical coupled oscillators, where individual units are interacting only when the mean state of the system lies within a certain proximity of the phase space. They interact globally with mean-field diffusive coupling in a certain vicinity and behave like uncoupled oscillators with self-feedback in the remaining complementary subspace. Interestingly due to this occasional interaction, we find that the system shows an abrupt explosive transition from oscillatory to death state. Further, in the explosive death transitions, the oscillatory state and the death state coexist over a range of coupling strengths near the transition point. We explore our claim using Van der Pol, FitzHugh-Nagumo and Lorenz oscillators with dynamic mean field interaction. The dynamic interaction mechanism can explain sudden suppression of oscillations and concurrence of oscillatory and steady state in biological as well as technical systems. Copyright (C) 2021 EPLA

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据