4.7 Article

Potato tubers contamination with nitrate under the influence of nitrogen fertilizers and spray with molybdenum and salicylic acid

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 25, 期 7, 页码 7076-7089

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-1075-y

关键词

Nitrogen; Salicylic acid; Molybdenum; Nitrate accumulation; Nitrate reductase; Potato

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A field trial was conducted through 2015 and 2016 growing seasons to study the effect of nitrogen fertilizer sources and foliar spray with molybdenum (Mo), salicylic acid (SA) and their combination on tubers yield, some chemical constituents, nutrients uptake, nitrate accumulation and nitrate reductase activity in potato tubers. N source was added at a rate of 350 kg N ha(-1)in five equal doses as two different forms, the first is urea and the second is ammonium sulfate plus calcium nitrate equally. SA was sprayed with three rates of 0, 75 and 150 mg l(-1). Also, Mo as ammonium molybdate was sprayed using three rates 0, 50 and 100 mg l(-1)Mo. Both treatments of SA and Mo were applied separately as well as with each other, at three successive times 30, 50 and 70 days after planting of potato plants. Results indicated that the addition of 350 kg N ha(-1) as ammonium sulfate and calcium nitrate equally caused a significant elevation (P > 0.05) in fresh weight, chlorophyll b, carotenoids, chlorophyll a, nitrate reductase activity, dry weight and NPK uptake by potato tubers compared with the same amount of nitrogen in the form of urea only. All the aforementioned characteristics were improved with increasing concentration of Mo and/or SA. The highest accumulation of nitrate was recorded under the addition of 350 kg N ha(-1) as urea alone. The highest average of all the aforementioned characteristics was observed at the treatment of 350 kg N ha(-1) as ammonium sulfate and calcium nitrate equally plus spraying with 100 mg l(-1)Mo and 150 mg l(-1) SA. In contrast, this treatment gave the lowest accumulation of nitrates in potato tubers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据