3.8 Review

Current view of iron biomineralization in magnetotactic bacteria

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY-X
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.yjsbx.2021.100052

关键词

Biomineralization; Magnetotactic bacteria; Magnetosome; Iron oxides

资金

  1. Israel Science Foundation [167/16]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biomineralization is the process of mineral formation by living organisms, with magnetotactic bacteria being an example that can form magnetic nanoparticles through a specialized organelle called magnetosome. This process is controlled by a set of magnetosome-associated proteins, leading to well-defined magnetic properties of the formed magnetite nanoparticles.
Biomineralization is the process of mineral formation by living organisms. One notable example of these organisms is magnetotactic bacteria (MTB). MTB are Gram-negative bacteria that can biomineralize iron into magnetic nanoparticles. This ability allows these aquatic microorganisms to orient themselves according to the geomagnetic field. The biomineralization process takes place in a specialized sub-cellular membranous organelle, the magnetosome. The magnetosome contains a defined set of magnetosome-associated proteins (MAPs) that controls the biomineralization environment, including iron concentration, redox, and pH. Magnetite formation is subjected to a tight regulation within the magnetosome that affects the nanoparticle nucleation, size, and shape, leading to well-defined magnetic properties. The formed magnetite nanoparticles have unique characteristics of a stable, single magnetic domain with narrow size distribution and high crystalline structures, which turned MTB into the subject of interest in multidisciplinary research. This graphical review provides a current overview of iron biomineralization in magnetotactic bacteria, focusing on Alphaproteobacteria. To better understand this complex mechanism, we present the four main steps and the main MAPs participating in the process of magnetosome formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据